2009 December | Living Green On Earth >>

Blog Post Catagories

My Bloglog

Powered by MyBlogLog
Join My Community at MyBloglog!
free counters

Vanishing Honeybees

No Gravatar

Help call for vanishing honeybees

Britain’s honeybees are disappearing at an “alarming” rate, yet the government is taking “little interest” in the problem, a group of MPs has said.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) says bees, vital for pollinating crops, are worth £200m a year to the economy.

It wants Defra to spend more money on research into bee health and make registration compulsory for beekeepers.

Environment Secretary Hilary Benn said £10m had been earmarked to analyse the decline of pollinators, including bees.

But the PAC wants the government to ring-fence that money for honeybees alone and not allow it to be diluted by looking at other pollinating insects.

‘Colonies lost’

The government says bee numbers have fallen by up to 15% in the last two years, in part because agricultural changes have reduced the availability of the wildflowers they depend on for food.

Disease, climate change and pesticide use have also been blamed for the decline.

Honeybees and other pollinators are absolutely vital to producing our food
Environment Secretary Hilary Benn

Chairman of the PAC, Edward Leigh

said: “Honeybees are dying and colonies are being lost at an alarming rate.”

Given their value to the economy, he said it was “difficult to understand why Defra has taken so little interest in the problem up to now”.

Registration is currently voluntary for beekeepers, but the PAC says making it compulsory would allow Defra to deliver advice on bee husbandry to far more people.

Mr Benn said: “Honeybees and other pollinators are absolutely vital to producing our food.

“Defra is providing financial backing for a £10m research initiative into pollinator decline, including honey bees, with decisions on projects to be made in the coming months.”

The British Beekeepers Association has backed the PAC’s call for research spending to be ring-fenced.

Source

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The GP2 Project

No Gravatar
This Laysan Albatross chick has been accidenta...
Image via Wikipedia

Here is an awesome website to check out. “The GP2 Project”

The GP2 Project is a multi-million dollar project that has two intentions:

  1. To clean up the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” and
  2. To create a healthy and vibrant Ocean and Planet right now.

What is the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch”?

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is a swirling mass of plastic waste and garbage that has accumulated in the Pacific Ocean due to Ocean currents and is impacting all life.

Come check out their work:  GP2

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Paper or plastic

No Gravatar

Paper or plastic: Environmental debate rages

Bradentonhearld.com

There’s a debate brewing over paper and plastic bags. And it has nothing to do with consumers’ preference at the checkout counter.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection is preparing an analysis for the Legislature in which it will propose regulations on bags at retail establishments. The statewide analysis, which is expected to be completed by Feb. 1, has some retailers and consumers concerned about the possibility the DEP will recommend banningor taxing paper and plastic bags.

“We would not favor a bag ban on plastic or paper,” said Samantha Hunter Padgett, deputy general counsel for the Florida Retail Federation. “These are both readily recyclable materials that exist for the convenience of our consumers.”

Retailers are concerned because this won’t be the first retail bags report published by the DEP. In October, the state agency published a retail bags report that recommended the Legislature prohibit retailers from providing paper and plastic bags.

That report and its recommendations were withdrawn shortly after its release.

“After further review of the preliminary report, the department realized it did not contain all of the recommendations and options that needed to be included before its release,” said Amy Graham, public information officer for the DEP. “The preliminary draft was withdrawn and should not be considered the agency’s recommendation.”

B ut environmental activists such as Glenn Compton, president of Mansota-88, supported the DEP’s original proposal and says Manasota-88 continues to recommend banning the use of both bags.

“Our main concerns are litter, clogging of the storm drains and impact to wildlife,” Compton said. Compton added the DEP’s original recommendation to ban retail bags by 2015 was reasonable. “It’s become quite controversial but they were recommending a phase out and banning of the bag in five years,” Compton said. “They’ve been getting quite a bit of criticism but we fully support DEP’s efforts to eliminate plastic and paper bags.”

The DEP says its new analysis, which is under way, will focus on whether retail bag regulation is necessary by considering the following: the amount of retail bags that are made and recycled, littering, the impact on wildlife and the retail industry’s response. The department is holding public hearings until the report is completed to gather public input.

Graham said the agency could not comment on what possible recommendations might be included in the second report.

“We are still working on a draft report so it is too premature to say what the recommendations may be and what the Legislature will decide to do with those recommendations,” Graham said. “All policy options are currently under consideration.”

Diane Crumpton opted for plastic bags for her groceries during a recent shopping trip to Publix. Crumpton said she’s opposed to a ban on plastic bags given the additional use she gets out of them. “I use a lot of plastic bags around the house,” Crumpton said. “They come in very handy for me.” Shannon Patten, a spokeswoman for Publix, said the grocery store, too, would not favor a ban.

“We would be opposed to a ban,” Patten said. “We think customers deserve choices and we want to give them choices whether it’s plastic bags, paper bags or our 99-cent reusable bags.”

However, Compton said if retailers and consumers don’t want a ban, implementing a tax on paper and plastic could be an option.

“We’re finding that the use of retail bags is a cost to the consumer and taxpayers are subsidizing the disposal of these bags at the landfills,” Compton said.

Manasota-88 estimates retailers nationwide spend $4 billion a year on plastic bags.

John Rorer, owner of Richard’s Whole Foods, said his main concern regarding the DEP’s pending proposals is whether regulations will include biodegradable plastic bags.

About two years ago, Richard’s Whole Foods started using biodegradable plastic bags to replace regular plastic and paper bags. A non-toxic additive is added to the bags during manufacturing that allows them to break down more rapidly in the landfill.

“Rather than banning plastic we tried to resolve the issue by going to 100 percent biodegradable plastic bags,” Rorer said. “If the state wants to ban plastic, I hope the ban would not be on biodegradable plastic. That would be self-defeating.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Is Florida Govenor Crist Losing His Green Reputation

No Gravatar

Crist losing his green reputation

Everyone except the governor thinks his change of heart on the environment is political.

Charlie Crist’s first two years as governor thrilled environmental activists. He helped block a coal-fired power plant from being built near the Everglades, halted a drive to take manatees off the state’s endangered list and convened a summit in Miami to deal with global warming, vowing to make it an annual event.

“He was more green than any governor had ever been before,” said David Guest of Earth justice, an environmental law firm. But since he launched his bid for a U.S. Senate seat this year, Crist has left environmentalists feeling jilted. He canceled his climate summit. He didn’t fight the Legislature’s move to end funding for the popular Florida Forever environmental land buying program. He signed a controversial bill changing the state’s growth management law. And he has all but endorsed a proposal to allow drilling for oil near Florida’s gulf beaches.

What happened to the man they once called “Governor Green”?

“I think he’s found it politically extremely difficult to follow his heart on green matters with (Republican primary challenger Marco) Rubio looming over him,” Guest said. The business leaders who now find Crist on their side on major environmental issues say they, too, consider his conversion politically driven.

“It’s only because he’s running for election to the Senate and he’s up against Marco Rubio,” said Barney Bishop, president of Associated Industries, a business group that has long criticized Crist’s environmental positions. “This is not a serious change of heart.”

Crist doesn’t dispute that his positions have changed but says it’s not because of his Senate bid.

“It has nothing to do with the race,” Crist said. “It has everything to do with the economy.”

If Florida’s economy weren’t in such poor shape, he explained, he would have no problem restarting Florida Forever, battling climate change and opposing offshore drilling. But right now, he said, “my first and foremost duty is to help this economy.”

Told that four former governors — Reubin Askew, Bob Graham, Bob Martinez and Jeb Bush — have all called for him to reinstate funding for Florida Forever, Crist countered: “They’re not in my shoes. They’re not dealing with this budget. I am.” ‘A leader controlling climate change’ In his first address to the Legislature in March 2007, Crist said global warming is “one of the most important issues that we will face this century.”

He promised to “bring together the brightest minds” and “place our state at the forefront of a growing worldwide movement to reduce greenhouse gases.”

Crist convened a two-day climate-change summit in Miami that attracted 600 participants, then announced far-reaching changes in the state’s energy policies: cutting power plant emissions, requiring the use of alternate fuels and rewriting the building code to require more energy efficiency.

“I think that as a state, beautiful as Florida is, we need to be a leader controlling climate change and protecting our natural 11/30/2009 For Gov. Charlie Crist, it’s not easy

resources,” Crist said then. “It’s vital to Florida’s future.”

Crist’s climate-change crusade got him national attention, with a write-up in Time magazine and an interview on the CBS Early Show. He shared a stage with singer Sheryl Crow and met with Robert Redford. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger called him “another great action hero.”

He held a second summit in 2008 and even flew to London to participate in climate-change talks with British leaders.

Meanwhile, he halted a move by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to remove the manatee from the state’s endangered list. And at his urging the Public Service Commission rejected a plan by the state’s largest utility to build a $5.7 billion coal-fired power plant near Everglades National Park.

“He started strong,” said Manley Fuller of the Florida Wildlife Federation. But now “he’s dealing with a different political environment.”

Once Crist became a Senate candidate, his opponent in the Republican primary, former House Speaker Rubio, painted Crist’s environmental moves as a liability among the right wing.

“I guarantee you he won’t be touting the work he did with Sheryl Crow as part of his primary platform,” Rubio said.

Sure enough, Crist canceled his 2009 summit, contending it would cost too much. Most of his global warming initiatives petered out in the face of opposition from the Legislature.

“He had the state positioned to be a leader,” said Eric Draper, executive director of Audubon of Florida. “For two years people put in a lot of work (on Crist’s initiatives). But in the end, the real stuff that would’ve made a difference . . . those things were not accomplished.”

Then, despite strong lobbying by the environmental groups that had once praised him, he signed into law Senate Bill 360, which rewrites Florida’s 25-year-old growth management law by allowing developers in the most urban counties to add more housing without expanding roads. Supporters said it would help stimulate the state’s flagging construction and real estate industries.

And Crist said he would be “open-minded” about a proposal — backed by legislative leaders — to drill for oil within 3 miles of the state’s beaches. The measure passed the House but died in the Senate.

“Crist could’ve been the hero on this,” Draper said. “That would’ve been the perfect Charlie Crist moment.”

Since Crist didn’t oppose it, it’s likely to come back up again in the session next spring.

Everglades is still a legacy move. No matter what else he does, Crist’s successful push for a $536 million deal with U.S. Sugar Corp. to buy 73,000 acres of its land to for Everglades restoration will always be remembered as one of his boldest environmental initiatives, said Fuller.

Even though the size of the buyout wound up being far smaller than Crist first promised, “that’s probably the biggest legacy he’ll have,” agreed Guest of Earthjustice.

Crist — who is quick to mention his Everglades restoration initiative — insists he has not turned his back on environmental issues, despite what the activists may think.

“I hope my credentials on the environment are pretty clear,” the governor said. “I care deeply about it and want to do everything I can to protect it.”

Guest predicted that, if Crist beats Rubio in the Republican primary, he will revert to his old positions.

“I don’t think Charlie’s green politics were gambit,” he said. “I think that was the real Charlie.”

Craig Pittman 11/30/2009 For Gov. Charlie Crist, it’s not easy bei…

tampabay.com/news/politics/…/1054946

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Plenty of Green Energy in Florida

No Gravatar
Electrical power is distributed via cables and...
Image via Wikipedia

South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com

Plentiful, green energy goes untapped in Florida

Natural resources, including sun, sea and wind, are little used

By Ken Kaye, Sun Sentinel

November 27, 2009

The Sunshine State receives enough rays to power every home from Key West to Pensacola. It sits close to a powerful ocean current, which could generate electricity. And it could draw on the winds to light up homes.

Yet these sources of green energy are largely untapped.

Most residents consider solar energy to be a futuristic or impractical concept. Developing ocean currents as an energy source would require spending billions on engineering special turbines, a price neither government nor business is currently willing to pay.

And wind remains a questionable source of power because it doesn’t blow strongly or consistently enough on Florida’s mainland.

As a result, Florida ranks 23rd in the nation in energy efficiency, according to the nonprofit American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.

“We buried our head in the sand,” said Camille Coley, executive assistant vice president for research at Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton. “We want to continue to live our lives and not make necessary changes.”

It’s not like the state isn’t trying. Gov. Charlie Crist and the Legislature created the Florida Energy & Climate Commission in 2008 to promote and develop alternative energy sources as well as to study how to reduce greenhouse gases. The commission has helped usher through legislation to increase energy efficiency in state-owned buildings and cars and to require all new buildings be more energy efficient by 2019.

Further, the Florida Public Service Commission has recommended utilities generate 20 percent of their power through renewable energy sources within the next 10 to 20 years. The Legislature is considering that plan but unless Florida commits millions more toward the effort, green energy is probably decades away.

“The technology is there,” said Craig Williams, executive director of the Florida Renewable Energy Association, whose home is completely powered by solar energy. “There’s no reason why all Floridians can’t be using it.”

Solar energy

By far the state’s most readily available natural resource, the sun shines in Miami about 70 percent of the time there is available daylight, according to the National Weather Service. Compare that to 58 percent of the time in New York City or 47 percent in Seattle.

Even when it’s cloudy, sun rays penetrate to the ground, said meteorologist Rusty Pfost.

“We get a lot of sun here, so solar energy is definitely something we could do more of,” he said.

To encourage its widespread use, Florida had offered residents a rebate up to $20,000 for using solar panels but funding has run dry.

The state otherwise has applied pressure on utilities to rely more on renewable energy. In October, FPL opened a solar-powered plant in Arcadia with 90,000 solar panels, able to power up to 35,000 homes.

Steven Baillie, owner of Solar Concepts in Boca Raton, said he installed six solar systems on homes this year. He recently placed 26 solar panels on the roof of a Lake Worth home at a cost of about $50,000 before rebates.

Each panel is about 15 square feet and produces 200 to 300 watts of electricity in direct sunlight, enough to power air conditioning, television sets and computers.

Baillie said the system will pay for itself in about four to five years, adding, “It’s a good investment.”

He estimates about 1,000 homes in South Florida have already installed solar panels. Yet, according to the Florida Energy & Climate Commission, the number of homes that use solar energy — and requested a state rebate — is fewer than 200.

The Gulf Stream

Another plentiful but untapped source, this current flows north along the U.S. East coast and is most powerful near South Florida. Turbines, similar those in hydroelectric dams, could be sunk into its deep channel to generate power.

“It has even more potential than sunshine because it’s reliable day to day,” said Jim Lushine, a retired weather service meteorologist, whose job included monitoring ocean currents. “It’s going all the time.”

Obstacles stand in the way, however. The cost would likely be several billion dollars and the turbines would need to be anchored, possibly by platforms similar to oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. That would pose a threat to marine life and coral reefs.

Still, it’s an idea some universities are studying. Florida Atlantic University already has deployed undersea sensors off Dania Beach to measure the current at different depths.

In doing so, the university’s Center for Ocean Energy Technology hopes to determine where the current would be strong enough to run through the turbines and produce the maximum amount of electricity.

With support from the state as well as a $1.2 million federal grant, the center is working with Florida State University and the University of Central Florida and other partners.

Wind

While this is also a potential source of electricity, experts say it doesn’t blow consistently enough on Florida’s mainland to be reliable.

Wind turbines could be anchored offshore; however, they would not be practical around South Florida because of the depth of the ocean and because they might endanger coral reefs and marine sanctuaries, a Florida Public Service Commission study found. The study recommended North Florida as a better possible site.

Currently, there are no wind farms, or numerous turbines clustered together, in Florida. However, FPL is planning a wind farm in St. Lucie County as a means to increase its renewable energy production.

Outside of Florida, NextEra Energy, a subsidiary of FPL Group, is the largest generator of wind energy in North America. It operates more than 8,300 wind turbines at 66 farms in 16 states and two Canadian provinces.

Biomass

This is material derived from vegetative debris, agricultural waste and solid waste plants. In other words, it’s garbage. But it can burned in special plants to produce electricity as well as ethanol.

FPL, the state’s largest utility, says it uses biomass to run plants in Broward, Palm Beach, Volusia and Putnam counties. Progress Energy, another utility, also operates biomass plants in Central Florida.

Biomass likely will be increasingly used as an alternative energy source as it is abundant and relatively easy to harvest, experts said.

Hugh Willoughby, a professor in the Earth and Environment Department of Florida International University, said government, universities and business need to develop alternative energy technologies.

“If they’re used on a wide enough scale, the cost would probably come down,” he said.

Copyright © 2009, South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

MaxBlogPress Ninja Affiliate

Wine Club

Coffee

LinkShare  Referral  Prg